Writing Center- Monroe County Community College


THEORY TO PRACTICE ESSAYS

[ Back to Theory to Practice Main Page ] [ Back to Fall 2000 Essays ]

 

 

Tips For Tutoring a Student With a Research Paper "Due Soon"
Sara Aftanas

“Close your eyes. Take deep breaths and relax,” I instructed. I had introduced the relaxation technique, found on the Purdue University OWL website, because I had assumed the student was just as worried as I was concerning her situation. I had hoped the student found it as useful as I did, but to my amazement the student was not anxious about her seven page research paper that was due the next day—the one she had not started yet! Knowing what she was about to attempt, I was worried enough for the both of us. Tutoring for a research paper can be overwhelming because of the length of the paper, the complexity of the topic, and the many techniques that can be applied. Lucille Deutsch, director of the Learning Center at Rio Grande College, agrees in her article “The Research Paper: How the Tutor Can Help” that “Trying to help a student with a research paper that is due ‘today’ can be a frustrating experience for both the tutor and the tutee” (1). A tutor can only accomplish a limited amount in an hour-long session. Although I am not responsible for the student waiting until the last minute to begin the paper, as a tutor I have an obligation to hold the most productive session possible for the situation. The few resources available that address the subject of tutoring for a research paper when the paper is “due soon” left me unprepared to handle the situation when it arose. I began by asking myself what I thought a more experienced tutor would do in this situation? I did not have an answer, which led me to question how often a tutor should anticipate encountering this situation? The results of a survey I conducted, using the tutors in the MCCC Writing Center, showed nearly half of all students tutored scheduled an appointment the day before or the day the paper was due! This frustrating situation can become a productive experience for both the tutor and tutee if the tutor is prepared. As tutors we can effectively handle the many situations we encounter with students by following specific sets of techniques designed to fit the individual’s situation. When a research paper is “due soon” a productive tutoring session can be achieved through establishing a relationship with the student, setting an agenda, prioritizing, and encouraging the use of reference materials.

One of the most important approaches to tutoring in any situation is establishing a positive working relationship with the student. In the article “An Approach to Conferencing,” located in the Purdue Writing Lab Newsletter, Anita Brostoff of Carnegie-Mellon University emphasizes “Taking a few planned and purposeful minutes to talk with students before working on the problem is well worth the time it takes”(8). Establishing a positive working relationship with the student builds trust so that communication is more effective. A trusting relationship between the tutor and tutee makes the most effective use of time possible so that many topics can be covered in an hour. The Allyn and Bacon Guide to Peer Tutoring advises the tutor become an expert at building trust (26). At the start of a session, the tutor may refrain immediately jumping in to tutoring the writing process. Instead the tutor may take a few carefully planned minutes to get to know the student. We can do this by inquiring about “the student’s attitude toward writing and [his or her] feelings about [his or her] ability as a writer” (Brostoff 7). This can give the tutor the opportunity to let the student know that the tutor has been “in their shoes”, has written several research papers, and can address the writer’s individual situation adequately. Knowing this should encourage the writer to not only apply the writing strategies learned during the session for the paper, but encourage her to incorporate new writing habits into all of her writing.

Agenda setting is a strategy used in all writing sessions but is critical in those that involve research papers. There are two methods of setting an agenda. The first is described in the Allyn and Bacon Guide to Peer Tutoring as a feedback sequence that allows the tutor and student to addresses writing issues in an interaction pattern. The Tutor and student address the initial chosen topic and move onto the next only when the previous topic is completely understood by the writer (136). This method allows only a limited number of concerns to be resolved and does not guarantee covering high order concerns. The complex nature of a research paper requires an agenda setting strategy that can establish an outline for the tutoring session to ensure all topics are addressed. A more effective strategy for setting an agenda when a research paper is concerned is to ask the student a series of open and closed ended questions. Questions that I have found to be the most useful in determining the course of the session include, how familiar are you with the Research Process? What is the paper’s topic? How do you intend to conduct research? Is there a thesis statement? Have you made an outline? These questions are intended to establish a starting point for the tutor. Another factor to consider when setting an agenda, is “One of the many tricky parts of tutoring is not only uncovering [the goals of the tutor], but negotiating with the writer on a mutually agreeable goal” (Gillespie 49). The writer may come into the session with goals of her own, which can conflict with the intention of the tutor. For example, in an interview conducted with Shawna Farley, a Writing Fellow in the MCCC Writing Center, an account was given of a student asking for help with MLA on his works cited page. Shawna found the paper had a higher order concern. The student had not cited any sources he had used in his text. Shawna was able to compromise with the student. She would address his works cited page after he cited his sources in his paper (Farley). It is important to recognize the needs of the student as to not discourage a return to the writing center.

Once the agenda is determined, it is essential for the tutor to prioritize concerns so that the session can be as productive as possible. Because of the many stages of the research process, time management is key to addressing all concerns of the agenda. Lucille Deutsch gives steps for the tutor to follow when tutoring a student with a research paper. She suggests the tutor begin with developing a topic. Then help the student construct an outline followed by tools for conducting research, development, and documentation (2). These steps can be modified to fit the individual’s situation. The student mentioned earlier, who had not started her paper yet, was not at all familiar with the research process. I helped her get started by introducing her to the college library’s website. Using the computer located in the Writing Center, together we explored her topic using the college libraries subscription service. This hands-on approach not only built the student’s confidence to conduct research using a variety of methods, but also encouraged the student to consider narrowing her topic. Hands-on methods such as the one described are another useful tool that can help the student remember what has been addressed in the session after she leaves the writing center.

Giving students tools to use as reference outside of the writing center encourages the student to use strategies not addressed in the tutoring session. Prioritizing the session’s agenda, allows the tutor to address the most important topics to be covered. Because of the overwhelming amount of information to concentrate on, not everything will be addressed. Even after the student leaves the writing center, some of details gone over in the session can be forgotten. To ensure the student retains all the information necessary to write their paper, a tutor can give the student reference material such as outlines, writing strategies, and handouts. Giving the student strategies to approach writing without a tutor is helpful if the student cannot schedule a follow up appointment with a Writing Fellow before their paper is due. The student can also refer to these materials if she finds herself in a state of panic and stuck on how to proceed when writing the paper. In Lucille Deutsch’s article she emphasizes the importance of creating an outline during the session, “With an outline completed to provide as a check and a guide, the student then usually becomes aware of any organizational changes necessary for the paper and can take steps to align the support material according to the outline” (1). A tutor can also show students writing strategies that help them to develop their writing. In session with a student that I have been tutoring regularly, I encouraged her to make a habit of asking herself the questions I would normally ask in regards to developing her paragraphs. For example, the student’s topic was about Christmas as the most popular holiday because of decorations, gifts, and family. To help her develop body paragraphs I encouraged her to ask herself why decorations made Christmas popular? How decorations made Christmas popular? Could she give examples of decorations making Christmas popular? Encouraging students to ask themselves questions such as why, what, when, where, who, and how produces results. Including examples in the text is another suggestion the student can use to think critically about writing. Promoting the use of editing helpers and format guides will allow for time to be spent on other things that require more explanation. Most importantly, outlining a plan of action personalized to fit the student’s needs together with the student will help her to stay focused and to remember what was learned during the session.

Establishing a relationship with the student, setting an agenda, prioritizing, and encouraging the use of reference materials are methods used in an attempt to develop a structured approach to tutoring the research process within a limited amount of time. These methods not only help the student write a research paper but also build confidence. Even if the student does not incorporate new writing practices into the paper, she is equipped with the knowledge to use it for future papers. As stated in the general practices section of the MCCC Writing Center Handbook for Writing Consultants and Tutors, compiled by Dr. John Holladay and revised by Timothy J. Dillon, “[The tutor] will try to instill and maintain realistic expectations . . . will not expect miracles, and will not accept mediocrity. Improvement, not perfection, is a realistic goal” (4). With only an hour assigned to help each student, the tutor must accept that only a limited amount of information can be addressed. Holding the most productive session within that hour can hopefully lead a student to schedule appointments further in advance.

Works Cited

Appointment Scheduling in the Writing Center. E-mail survey conducted by author. 8-12 Dec. 2003.

Brostoff, Anita. “An Approach to Conferencing.” Writing Lab Newsletter 4.7 (1980): 7-8. OWL at Purdue University 20 Nov. 2003
       <http://owl.English.purdue.edu>.

“Coping with Anxiety.” Purdue University Online Writing Lab 20 Nov. 2003 <http://owl.English.purdue.edu>.

Dillon, Timothy. Writing Center Handbook For Writing Consultants and Tutors: Monroe County Community College
     Monroe, Michigan. Comp. John Holladay.1995.

Deutsch, Lucille. “The Research Paper: How the Tutor Can Help.” Writing Lab Newsletter 6.2 (1981): 1-2. OWL at Purdue
     University 20 Nov. 2003. <http://owl.English.purdue.edu>.

Farley, Shawna. E-mail interview. 9-10 Dec. 2003.

Gillespie, Paula and Neal Lerner. The Allyn and Bacon Guide to Peer Tutoring. 2nd ed. NY: Pearson Educ., 2004.

 

Required versus Non-Required Tutoring: Recognition and Techniques
Dan Burnard

The Monroe County Community College (MCCC) Writing Center assists anyone who comes in and seeks help with his or her writing. Students routinely see the Writing Fellows by making appointments, walking in, communicating with a tutor via e-mail, or by participating in a “fellowed” class. Many teachers require students to visit with a Writing Fellow, giving us (Writing Fellows) a challenge. However, many new tutors are unaware of the new challenges that tutoring presents. There are two types of students—required and non-required—who have completely different body language and attitudes when participating in a session. Of these two, required students are the most difficult. It is important that Writing Fellows be aware of body language, attitudes, and methods too effectively tutor required students.

Body language of non-required students is generally positive. With non-required students, motivation is to hone writing skills or to improve a paper, so an audience and their own attentive listening is important to them, and their body language accurately reflects this. In my survey of thirteen Writing Fellows at MCCC, I have discovered most non-required students reflect positive body language towards the tutor. Body language such as leaning forward in chair when the tutor is pointing things out, calm voice, eye contact, and spirit in discussions all point to a student who wants to be there. Though these body language messages are positive, some, like nervousness, can occur and usually do if the student is new to the writing center. It is important, therefore, to remember to compliment the good in any student’s paper. I have found non-required students to be pleasing to work with. Their body language reflects their pleasure in seeing other Writing Fellows or myself, and through this, I know them to be listening.

Required students usually exhibit the negative side of body language. Most of these signs are obvious: not caring, impatience, jittery, slouching, signing, crossing arms, little eye contact, shrugging, and looking around are the most common in my survey. Disinterest is widely the cause and not listening is the result. Take note: not every student wants to be helped, and holding him there may only make the student feel a prisoner. When all of your well thought-out questions go unanswered the problem may not be you, but the student. “Not everyone is meant to be helped. But be comforted: maybe after the writer leaves, she will rethink her decisions or see her instructor” (Gillespie 178).

While working in the MCCC Writing Center, a student from my fellowed class walked in. My fellowed class students were required to see a Writing Fellow before turning in their papers. Noticing a sarcastic tone and disinterest, it was obvious to me she did not want to be there. After explaining how the session would run, she read her paper out loud. Her feelings afterwards were far from optimistic. Author, Muriel Harris points out that tutors should empathize with students who are required to come to see a writing tutor. “If they resent being required to visit the writing center, then let them know that you understand what it feels like to be required to do something, but emphasize the positive” (qtd. in Houp, par. 3). Knowing this, I tell my student how I was forced (by my parents) to participate in my school’s band. At the time I resented being there, but given time, I realized how good band was for me and indicated to the student what I gained from being forced to do something. In doing this, I used the second part to Harris’s ideas: encouragement; because, “There is no substitute for positive thinking particularly in situations where students aren’t necessarily that excited about being there” (qtd. in Houp, par. 3). This short change in topic helped the session by easing her up and allowing her to express her opinions since I too have shown her that I knew what she was going through.

Non-required students often bring an attitude to a session complementary to their body language. In my survey and in my own experiences in the Writing Center, non-required students show more attention, quickness in answers, focus on work, and eagerness to help out. The same image of these attitude attributes can be seen in their body language from above. These attitudes aid the session in several ways. First, since agenda building is up to the tutor and student, having a common goal helps achieve agenda building between the tutor and student. And since goals on the agenda are met faster, the productivity power increases. Thirdly, it allows for tutors to relax because they know an interested audience is hearing them and do not have to struggle with gaining students’ attention. With these three positive aspects of a good tutoring session occurring simultaneously, the session is almost guaranteed to end favorably for the student and tutor.

Students required to come to writing centers are usually recognizable by their negative approach to writing tutors. The first words out of required students might be harsh to a tutor. A student who came in as a walk-in session told me once, “Look, I do not want to here but I need to. So fill out whatever form, so I can leave.” Though it was obvious this student did not want to be there, many students that are required to see a tutor try to act politely as possible. Their responses are then important to identifying these students. “Sometimes a writer will schedule an appointment and sit sullenly, say ‘I don’t know’ when you ask questions, or give monosyllabic and unenthusiastic replies” (Gillespie 179). When students are unenthusiastic about writing it becomes difficult to turn them around and nearly impossible in one session. Patience must be exerted when dealing with such students.

A session with another fellowed student illustrates the importance of knowing what emotional baggage students carry with them. When I introduced myself to her, she hardly seemed to care, no doubt believing since she had to see a Writing Fellow it might as well be me. We sat down and she sadly admitted that she did not have a rough draft, but just an outline. I worked with her, asking questions, stating what the teacher wants, and asking her what each division may discuss at greater depth. It became clear that something was occupying her mind more than the session. I slid a question in about the class the paper was for and also inquired about her other classes. Talking to students about themselves allows time for them to “relax and feel comfortable and start trusting you. She’ll [he’ll] also have a chance to express any anger and frustration or resentment – to get them out of the way” and once this is accomplished the student will concentrate better. “Preliminary talk will likewise give you an idea of what the student’s problems are and how to solve them” (Clark 111-13). She told me about her classes, the problem she was currently experiencing with grades, and being nervous about the grade she was going to receive on this paper. After telling her about my own current problems with writing I described time management techniques and pointed out the MCCC online subscription service and how she can reach it with any computer. When I left to go home I passed by her leaving the library. I asked if she looked at the online subscription service, she nodded and replied, “And printed off a lot.”

Required and non-required students offer tutors varying types of sessions. It is important to remember to look at body language and how they act in order to administer the proper methods. The above two methods are popular and frequently work. However, because tutoring is dealing with people, no one or two techniques work on everyone. As tutors, we should become aware of these methods to help the students and ourselves learn together.

Works Cited

Gillespie, Paula and Neal Lerner. The Allyn and Bacon Guide to Peer Tutoring. New York: Pearson Education, 2004.

Burnard, Daniel J. Survey of Monroe County Community College Writing Fellows. Issued 1 Nov. 2003.

Clark, Beverly Lyon. Talking About Writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1988.

Houp, Wes and Michele Petrucci. “Tutoring Reluctant Writers.” 6 Feb. 2003. Indiana University of Pennsylvania. 29 Nov. 2003.      <http://www.wc.iup.edu/ncptw/houpstrategy.htm>.


 

I See, You Hear, She Touches, and We All Learn
Shawna Farley

A beginning tutor experiences different fears, one being failure. Jennifer visits the Writing Center frequently, and is a 090 (remedial writing) tutee of mine. We are working together on writing a paragraph and her most difficult obstacle is avoiding sentence fragments; by the second week I realized we were not making progress and I felt inadequate as a tutor. Jackie Monroe a tutoring mentor suggests using different learning style techniques. There are three types of learning styles: auditory, visual, and kinesthetic. In the MCCC Writing Center it is not a lack of knowledge amongst tutors, but we are using our own learning styles and overlooking the others. Some tutors know how to explain an exercise used to reach a kinesthetic tutee, but o not have an ability to put it into practice and help the student. The goal is to focus on making the Writing Center a more personalized atmosphere to each individual and help close the gap between a kinesthetic tutee and visual tutor by starting with the tutor.

A more knowledgeable and experienced tutor can help another peer tutor grow equally in the ability to use all 3 styles, creating a more rounded and effective writing center, helping alleviate failure, and building a tutor’s confidence. If each tutor knows the right answer to every question it will not guarantee that students can grasp it and walk away fully understanding. Julie, an English 090 student, did not understand compare contrast, and she seemed restless and unfocused. I grabbed a pen and a pencil and explained the pen was dark blue, but the pencil was bright yellow; she still seemed confused. I handed her the pencil and pen and said, “Explain to me what you see.” She said, “An eraser.” I replied, “what about the pen, where is its eraser?” She became more involved using her topic and we moved her ideas onto her own paper. I did not realize at the time she was probably a kinesthetic learner and I was using a kinesthetic technique.

Majority of students are visual learners who learn through seeing; some are auditory who learn through hearing; and a small percentage of students are kinesthetic, and need to be actively involved in the process (Frailing par. 2, 3, 4). I modified a questionnaire for tutors to identify their tutees’ learning styles (Jordan). I had an easier time reaching visual learners; yet, when I was with an auditory student, who needs to listen and is less likely to write down instructions, I felt insecure and kept wondering “shouldn’t they be writing this down?” Another problem was keeping a kinesthetic learner focused. The solution was not being able to diagnose the tutee; but what to do afterward. Every tutor I interviewed is visual and using the same visual techniques. One peer said during the interview, “How do you reach a kinesthetic?” A senior tutor explained a cutting method she suggests her students use. I asked her to show me, but, she had never done it, and recommended I ask the two Writing Fellows she heard the technique from. In my interviews, there is a connection between visual learners using visual techniques, I showed this connection to the Senior Writing Fellow and she said, “We favor what we know.” Charles R. Beck the author of “Matching Teaching Strategies to Learning Style Preferences” explains, “It should come as no surprise that teachers tend to emphasize those strategies that reflect their own learning style tendencies. However, in so doing, they may be neglecting clusters of students who do not share the teachers teaching style preference.”

If tutors are only using one style of tutoring with students, that can create a gap between the tutee and tutor who may have different learning styles. “Excellent teachers seem to sense what and how to teach,” “they know, care, and can reach their students . . .They did not necessarily teach using their own dominant learning style. Rather they identified individual styles and worked with students, actively seeking out the best ways to connect with them” (Harr par. 2-3). Since tutors are often visual learners, they find it difficult to put into practice what they are hearing their tutoring peers say. We as tutors are as vulnerable to not grasping a concept when it does not tailor to our style as the students in our appointments. There needs to be a way to diagnose, know the techniques to use, and ultimately be able to use them. Otherwise, diagnosing and having the answer is of little value.

Jackie Monroe is a Writing Fellow who knows and practices learning style techniques. “I am a visual; I need to see it, not just hear it.” I explained to her and she sat down and showed me highlighter and cutting techniques that work well with visual and kinesthetic learners. She explained, “I think we all have an inner child that loves to color, cut, and play.” The process is simple when seeing each topic sentence in a different color. I used the highlighting exercise when I had appointments, and the results were exciting. I have one student who brings her own highlighters. I was eager to try these techniques on Jennifer. I fear Jennifer passing English 090 only to become overwhelmed with the same problems in the next course. I altered the highlighting technique by typing her paper exactly how she had it written on the computer. We read sentence by sentence aloud and asked her to highlight the ideas that seemed to go together. I showed her how to grab and pull the sentences, to move them around, and to create organization and flow. We used the word processing software to look at the sentences that had green underlines and I showed her how to click on the sentence to find a suggestion to improve and help with fragments. I asked her not to click the sentence suggestions but to try to rework it herself. She has been seeing me as her tutor for a month two times a week and having the same mistakes; I think using learning style techniques made us successful. She brought in her next assignment and the changes were amazing. She had one fragment in her whole paper, and as she read aloud to me, she said, “Oops, I missed that fragment.”

When a senior tutor, experienced in learning styles, helps a junior tutor on mastering and practicing the techniques, we work toward closing the gap and help to prevent a tutee leaving the lab feeling hopeless, as well as a tutor feeling failure. One reason for writing centers is that students need help, and using a peer can create unity of common ground. Most tutors and tutees are visual learners, and if the methods mirror, then the majority is reached, and the program is successful. Teaching each individual tutor how to put into practice each method of learning styles and students’ needs, we go beyond majority. Peer to peer tutoring is best when used by all who are part of the program. Everyone needs to learn in order to teach.

Works Cited

Beck, Charles R. “Matching Teaching Strategies to Learning Style Preferences.” The Teacher Educator. 37 (2001): 1-15.      WilsonSelectPlus. OCLC FirstSearch. Monroe County Community College Library, Monroe, MI. 3 Nov. 2003      <http://firstsearch.oclc.org/fsip>.

Frailing, Rebecca. “Working With Styles.” Monroe County Community College. 10 Nov. 2003 <http://www.monroeccc.edu/      writing/theory_to_practice_essays/theory_to_practice.htm>.

Harr, Jean, et.al. “How Teachers Teach To Students With Different Styles.” The Clearing House. 75 (2002): 142-4.
     WilsonSelectPlus. OCLC FirstSearch. Monroe County Community College Library, Mi. 3 Nov. 2003      <http://firstsearch.oclc.org/fsip>.

Jordan, Terri. “Learning Style Inventory.” Online Learning Strategy Series. 10 November 2003.

Monroe, Jackie. “Questionnaire on methods used” Field Research. Monroe County Community College Writing Center.
      13 Nov. 2003.

“Personal Interviews of Tutors” 10-14 Nov. 2003. 9 tutors interviewed.

“Questionnaire of College Tutees.” Field Research. Monroe County Community College Writing Center. 7 Nov. 2003.
      15 responses returned.

“Questionnaire of College Tutors.” Field Research. Monroe County Community College Writing Center. 7 Nov. 2003.
      6 responses returned.


 

 

Tutor vs. Teacher
Emily Jaworski

Being a member of the Writing Center at Monroe County Community College is a very difficult, but rewarding experience. It has taught me a great deal about being a good tutor as well as being a responsible individual. I have learned so much through working with students in the Writing Center and have gained a vast knowledge of writing skills. The role of a tutor versus the role of a teacher is very different; however, sometimes it is easy to combine them into one, while working with a student. Sometimes, students have the misconception that tutors will just correct their papers. It is our responsibility to let the student know tutors are there as arrows, pointing them in the right direction. As a tutor, there are three goals that must be achieved during each session: helping the student gain new skills as a writer, being caring and attentive to the student's needs, and being a coach to the student, not a teacher.

Having the student learn to take ownership of his or her own paper is one of the best skills a tutor can give a student. One of the ways to achieve this is by having the student read his or her paper aloud. According to Paula Gillespie and Neal Lerner, authors of The Allyn and Bacon Guide to Peer Tutoring, reading aloud accomplishes several things. It keeps the writer and student in control of his or her own paper, and puts the tutor in the position of the learner (30). Usually, the student will catch his or her own mistakes just from reading their paper to someone. A lot of the time, students will not take the extra couple minutes to read their papers aloud before they turn them in to their professors, because they do not realize the difference this makes. Another reason this strategy works is because it gives the tutor time to take notes. Sometimes the writing does not flow as well as it should. The tutor takes notes and after the reading ends, the tutor can ask questions. This allows the student time to talk, and by the end of the session, the student knows exactly what he or she wants to say. Gillespie supports this idea by saying "[...] in a good tutorial, the tutor asks questions, and the writer decides what to do with his draft" (30).

A good tutor is always caring and attentive of the student's needs (Gillespie 42). As a tutor, we need to look at how we are portraying ourselves to the student as an individual and as part of the writing center community. If we walk in the writing center complaining, because our test did not go so well the class before, the student is going to sense our bad attitude, making him or her very uncomfortable. We need to remember, students who come to the Writing Center are there for help and they want to feel as relaxed and wanted as possible. A great way to calm the student in the beginning is to take a couple minutes to get to know him or her. Body language is another way to make students feel as though tutors are listening attentively. Leaning forward while they read their papers, eye contact, and sitting close to them, are examples of how tutors can show they are listening and paying attention. As tutors, we need to show them we want to help them in any way we can. We want students to come back and enjoy their time in the Writing Center. According to my survey, students feel very comfortable in the MCCC Center and say there is nothing that would make it a more relaxed atmosphere. This shows that techniques, such as body language and getting to know the student, work.

My first session was with a girl who I had another class with. "Lisa" was very nervous about coming to the Writing Center, especially when she saw who she was going to be working with. She told me right away she did not really want to come, but felt she had to in order to get a good grade. I wanted to make her comfortable, so I started thinking of ways in which I could do so. I remembered sitting in Advanced Composition learning about body language and developing a rapport with the student in which both the tutor and the student are comfortable. I started by asking her questions about why she took the class and whether she liked it or not. By starting the session with questions that got us to know each other better, it took some of the pressure off. I also tried sitting a little closer to her, because I felt it was more comfortable then sitting across from her. Sitting together felt as if we were having a conversation rather than a tutoring session. I noticed "Lisa's" needs as a student and as a writer, and tried to be caring and attentive of them. Being considerate of her feelings helped the session go much smoother.

Tutors also need to realize when they are acting as teachers, instead of coaches or helpers. Tutors can easily give the student too much information and not ask enough open-ended questions. Open-ended questions are very useful in the Writing Center, because they make the student think about his or her paper. This is an easy way to have the student maintain control of his or her writing. When tutors notice themselves telling students what to do, they need to pause for a moment and get their thoughts together. They need to alter how the session is going and get back on track. Tutors need to remember their job is to lead students in the right direction, but let students discover their own writing skills and mistakes. Sometimes acting like a teacher isn't the tutor's fault, but the mindset of the student. Students, who do not visit the Writing Center often, usually do not know what to expect, so their mentality is set up for something completely different from what they are receiving. According to Brad Lieto, author of “Tutor and Teacher” taken from the MCCC Writing Center website, "[...] students often view tutors as teachers, expecting them to know everything and become a free answer machine" (par. 2). They believe tutors are in the Writing Center to do the work for them and they will not have to work for their grade (Lieto par. 2). When this happens, it is best to explain the Writing Center's policy and let the student decide whether to continue the session or to leave.

Letting the student take control of his or her own writing, making the Writing Center a comfortable place to learn, and being a tutor instead of a teacher are the three ways to make a tutoring session go smoothly. If tutors can accomplish these three things in each session, they have really helped the student, not just in the class they are coming for, but throughout their college experiences. As tutors, we must take control of each session, but maintain enough flexibility to let the student learn and grow as a writer.

Works Cited

Gillespie, Paula and Neal Lerner. The Allyn and Bacon Guide to Peer Tutoring. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 2002.

Lieto, Brad. “Tutor and Teacher” Writing Center Website. 11 Dec. 2003. <http://www.monroeccc.edu/writing/oryfall.htm>.

Survey. Personal. Nov.-Dec. 2003.


 

Linking Learning Styles with Teaching Styles
Cynthia Conn

The elements of learning, and the way in which students learn, are imperative academically. Matching a student’s learning style with a professor’s teaching style has many advantages for the college, the student, and the professor; but all learning styles should be introduced to students, so they will be ready for the challenges in the world. An important point to remember is that “education is not something we do to people; education is something people do for themselves” (Johnston 6), but by giving students the necessary tools to work with, all students could achieve their goals. Identifying a professor’s teaching style is inexpensive, and would not be time consuming for the college. Students have variables in their learning styles, which are independent, dependent, competitive, collaborative, avoidant, and participant, so it is important for students to know which learning variable they possess. All students have an element, which makes learning come natural to them. This element is something that is commonplace to the student, or better known as something the student can relate the teaching to in his or her life. The following are the three elements of learning: cognition, conation, and affectation. Along with the elements of learning is the student’s learning style. The student may be a visual learner, an auditory learner, or a kinesthetic learner. By matching a student’s learning style with a professors teaching style the student, the professor, and the college have an advantage in many different areas of teaching and learning.

A student’s learning style has an impact on how well he or she will develop academically. Typically there are six variables to categorize a student’s learning style. A student may be an independent learner, a dependent learner, a competitive learner, a collaborative learner, an avoidant learner, or a participant learner. The affect these variables have on the student are profound; therefore, the importance of matching a student’s learning style with a professor’s teaching style should be top priority to a college. In "Students’ Learning Styles in Two Classes: Online Distance Learning and Equivalent On-Campus," David P. Diaz and Ryan B. Cartnal state, "Independent learners prefer independent study and self-paced instruction and would prefer to work alone rather than with other students on course projects. Dependent learners look to the teacher and to peers as a source of structure and guidance and prefer an authority figure to tell them what to do. Competitive students learn in order to perform better than their peers and to receive recognition for their academic accomplishments. Collaborative learners acquire information by sharing and cooperating with teachers and peers. They prefer lectures with small-group discussion and group projects. Avoidant learners are not enthusiastic about attending class or acquiring class content. They are typically uninterested and are sometimes overwhelmed by class activities. Participant learners are interested in class activities and discussion and are eager to do as much class work as possible. They are keenly aware of, and have a desire to meet, the teacher’s expectations" (3-4).

Interesting as though it may seem, a teacher stated, “I assumed that my students naturally knew how to follow directions, discern the key facts from the incidental, and complete the assignment” (Johnston 1). Many teachers, professors, and tutors assume that students have been exposed to all the learning styles, and although students should be ready for college level instruction, many have not had the different styles introduced.

The elements of learning are essential for a professor or a tutor to know. The three elements of learning are “cognition, conation, and affectation.” “Cognition” interprets “how we process information,” “conation” defines how we “perform learning tasks,” and “affectation” is to “develop a sense of self” when what a student is working on does not “come naturally” (Johnston 1). These elements interact in the learning process.

A student’s learning style is important to the professor as well as to the student. A student needs to determine if he or she is a visual, auditory, or kinesthetic learner. A visual learner writes everything down. An auditory learner listens closely, but rarely writes. A kinesthetic learner likes to work with his or her hands, and will often try to take over teaching. Next there are another four learning styles that should be identified: Sequential, Precise, Technical, and Confluent. A “Sequential” learner must have a “plan to follow,” or “step by step instructions,” and activities should be thoroughly “organized.” A “Precise” learner will write “detailed notes,” and they will “ask questions,” and need “exact answers.” A “Technical” learner needs “hands on,” and works “alone.” A “Confluent” learner “takes risks,” and will always look for new ways to do a task. They are “imaginative” (Johnston 2). Testing a student for his or her learning style is not time consuming. A student needs to be tested with the Learning Styles Modality Quiz, and the Learning Combination Inventory. The Learning Styles Modality Quiz can be found in the Learning Assistance Lab. This quiz determines if a student’s learning style is visual, auditory, or kinesthetic. The next quiz is the Learning Combination Inventory. Figure 1 shows an example of the Learning Combination Inventory. This inventory quizzes students on their learning styles as well, but it encompasses whether a student is a Sequential, a Precise, a Technical, or a Confluent learner. Figure 1 is an example of the Learning Combination Inventory.

These statements are rated on the following scale: (1, Never Ever; 2, Almost Never; 3, Sometimes; 4, Almost Always; 5, Always).
1. I would rather build a project than read or write about a subject.
2. I need clear directions that tell me what is expected of me before I begin a task.
3. I instinctively correct others whose information or answers are not totally accurate.
4. I am willing to risk offering new ideas even in the face of discouragement.
5. I clean up my work area and put things back where they belong as soon as I finish a job.
6. I like hands-on assignments where I get to use mechanical/technical instruments.
7. I ask more questions than most people because I just enjoy knowing things.
Fig. 1. Learning Combination Inventory from Christine A. Johnston. “Using the Learning
Combination Inventory.” Education. 55 (Dec. 1997 and Jan. 1998): 1-7. Wilson Select Plus.
OCLC First Search. Monroe County Community College Library. Monroe, MI. 30 Oct. 2003.

The colleges, professors, tutors, and students have the advantage when students are tested for their learning styles. By matching a student with a professor who teaches his or her learning style, academic grades, as well as enrollment, could increase. A student once explained to his teacher how her teaching affected him. He said, “he wanted to follow instructions, but directions feel like someone putting their hand on my head and pushing down on me all the way through my stomach to the bottom of my feet” (Johnston 4). Students learning styles affect their grades. Grades have an affect on a student’s attitude, and that attitude can stop a student from enrolling in another semester.

Identifying a professor’s teaching style is inexpensive and would not be time consuming. A letter placed on the semester schedule next to a professor’s name could indicate his or her teaching style. As students grades increased there could be higher enrollment as well as higher achievement. Testing and documenting a student’s learning style is advantageous to all writing center tutors. If tutors knew a student’s learning style, more time could be spent on tutoring and less time spent on assessing.

Although teaching a student by his or her learning style is important, it is imperative that the other styles be introduced as well, so the student is ready for the challenges in the personal and working world. “If professors teach exclusively in their students’ modes, the students may not develop the mental dexterity they need to reach their potential for achievement in school and as professionals” (Felder 1). Dr. Holladay (MCCC English) is a perfect example of a professor who uses a variety of teaching styles to teach his students. An independent learner will have the opportunity to access assignments online, as well as complete online journal assignments. Dependent learners are given detailed instructional handouts and they are thoroughly covered in class. Competitive, and collaborative learners are encouraged by class discussion. Participant learners are free to ask questions in class, or visit him during office hours. And avoidant learners have the opportunity to take Dr. Holladay’s online course.

Knowing how a student learns is not only essential for the student, but for the college, professors, and tutors as well. Testing students on their learning style is imperative for matching the students learning styles with the professors’ teaching styles. The college, professors, students, and tutors have the advantage when students’ learning styles are documented. A student’s grades may increase, enrollment increases, and testing students for his or her learning style is not expensive. Identifying a professor’s teaching style is inexpensive, and is not time consuming. Although all learning styles should be taught to students, a college, professors, tutors, and students could achieve their highest goals if they all knew about and accommodated learning styles.

Works Cited

Diaz, David P. and Ryan B. Cartnal. “Students’ Learning Styles in Two Classes: Online Distance Learning and Equivalent
     On-Campus.” Education. 47.4 (Fall1999): 1-9. Wilson Select Plus. OCLC First Search. Monroe County Community College      Library. Monroe, MI. 30 Oct. 2003.

Felder, Richard. “Matters of Style.” Education. 6 (Dec. 1996): 1-11. Wilson Select Plus. OCLC First Search. Monroe County      Community College Library. Monroe, MI. 30 Oct. 2003.

Johnston, Christine A. “Using the Learning Combination Inventory.” Education. 55 (Dec. 1997 and Jan. 1998): 1-7.
     Wilson Select Plus. OCLC First Search. Monroe County Community College Library. Monroe, MI. 30 Oct. 2003.

 

Personal Space: The Invisible Barrier
Cherie Jolley

Socializing is an important part of everyday life. But how do we socialize and what are the rules? If you take a step back and notice people socializing, how far away from each other do they stand? Is there any touching involved? And how does all of this reflect their relationship with one another? Throughout our daily interactions individuals carry perceptions as to how close others should be to them while interacting. Individuals tend to have a distance that allows them to feel safe and secure. When this personal space is invaded, an individual may feel uncomfortable and experience other psychological effects. This distance can be divided as social, personal, or intimate and differs with each individual.

Personal Space is described as an “invisible boundary” around one’s “body into which others may not come” (Edupass par. 1). It is a distance that allows a person to feel comfortable with the one he or she is interacting with. Everyone’s Personal Space is different, but it is generally a little wider around the sides and gets bigger in front (Genocities par. 1). Personal Space can be observed in almost any interaction. This space expands or shrinks with each interaction depending on the relationship between the individuals (Jazwinski par. 2). When two people are close (best friends, intimates, family members) they tend to stand closer in their interactions. Think back to the last time you were in an elevator. When there are only a few people inside, we tend to stand farther away from them. As the elevator gradually fills, we are forced to stand closer to individuals. We dare not look at them, but instead look at the buttons in the elevator, the floor, or even the ceiling. Why? It is not as if looking at these things are interesting, but we are trying not to invade their personal space. We have no control over being forced to stand close to them. We are invading their personal space and feel uncomfortable; therefore we look away so we do not invade their space any further. Personal Space is not only a characteristic of humans. Animals often use this “spacing behavior” as well (Jazwinski par. 3). For instance, when birds are on a wire they are not standing right beside one another, but in fact each one is spaced apart all the way across the wire. Since everyone has his or her own Personal Space it may be difficult to determine the proper distance to stand while interacting. As a result someone’s space may be invaded causing extreme discomfort and other psychological effects.

When someone’s personal space is invaded extreme discomfort may result. As with the elevator situation, one may not know how to respond. A person may become nervous or extremely stressed if the invasion persists (Jazwinski par. 3). One’s Personal Space is so important that when it is invaded it is all that a person can focus on. Everything around is blocked out and all he or she can think about is gaining the space back. The person may back up, but if the individual closes the gap it may cause one to escape the situation, or even become aggressive (Jazwinski par. 3). Even when the invasion of Personal Space is unintentional the effects can be destructive. It is important to understand the different perceptions of Personal Space and the signs that one’s space is being invaded. Being aware can help spot when someone is feeling uncomfortable and ensure that the gap won’t close. Facial expressions are the key to a person’s emotions. When someone feels uncomfortable one can usually see the reflection in his or her face. If there are any signs of anger or resentment it may be a cue to back away. Other nonverbal behavior may also be visible. One may cross arms or lean back while trying to increase the space. People may use boundaries to ‘protect’ themselves from the invader. These barriers can consist of anything (a book, cup, etc.) that will separate them from the invaders. While a person whose space is being invaded suffers from psychological effects, the invader may suffer from sociological effects.

Sociological effects concern the perception of the invader. This is a sociological perception of the invaders as a result of their behaviors (Geocities par. 3). When a person’s Personal Space is small, he does not mind being close to people in interactions. He may not realize that they have the tendency to invade others space. Individuals may gain a subconscious perception of these invaders as a result of their tendencies. They may see them as “pushy” or “aggressive” people (par. 3). On the other hand, people who have large personal spaces do not invade one’s personal space of course, but instead stand at an uncomfortable distance away from others in interactions. They are so far away, it may be difficult to communicate with them and others may perceive them as being “cold” and “distant” individuals (par. 3). This large personal space is often used in dealing with people with disabilities. People tend to think negatively about those individuals with disabilities and do not want to be close to them. As a result they are given more personal space in social interactions in comparison to individuals without disabilities. “This social stigma tends to isolate a person with a disability to a much greater degree then the disability itself” (Kilbury par. 2). To ensure that one does not contribute to psychological effects or to a social stigma as a result of their tendencies, it is important to learn the ‘proper’ distance one must stand in each type of interaction.

Although Personal Space is difficult to determine since it may vary widely between each individual, there tends to be a general pattern among situations. Dr. Edward T. Hall developed four zones to study Personal Space. These zones reflect the type of relationship and interactions that may influence Personal Space. They consist of Intimate Distance, Personal Distance, Social Distance, and Public Distance (Stewart par. 8). “These zones are the areas we operate in” (par.9). The closest of these distances is the Intimate. This distance ranges from the person up to “18 inches” (par.8). Touching is permitted in this zone but it is only allowed with family or close friends. If someone touches outside of this zone, it is often unexpected and uncomfortable. Personal distance may break down into the Intimate Distance (1-1/2 to 2-1/2 feet) and may extend up to 4 feet (par. 12). Social Distance is from 4-7 feet at its closest, and 7-12 feet at it’s furthest. Public Distance consists of 12 feet and beyond. These distances serve as a guideline of variations of personal space.

Personal Space has always been of interest to me, but I never actually realized I was affected by it. One day during a session in the Writing Center with a female student I became shocked when she touched my arm while we were discussing her paper. I had always thought of the student-tutor relationship to be professional, yet friendly. It was not as if it was wrong for a student to touch a tutor, but since I had interpreted the relationship as somewhat professional, I did not expect any physical contact. I had never had this happen during a session before, and her invasion of my personal space made me feel uncomfortable. While reflecting on the session after it had ended, I started to think about my reaction to her invading my personal space. Maybe her perceptions of space during a session were different from mine. Regardless, I couldn’t help but feel uncomfortable. I starting contemplating the idea of personal space and realized that I had used tactics myself to ensure that I had my own space during a session. I thought back to how I unconsciously placed my nametag on the table in front of the chair that I did not want people to sit at. I also placed my book bag and items on the empty chairs I did not want to be filled. Before a session, I would move the chair next to me at a comfortable position. I used these tactics to get ready for a session each time, but I did not actually realize that I was preparing the situation to protect my own personal space.

I knew personal space varied between situations and relationships, but I was unclear as to the proper personal space within a session. As a Writing Fellow I played two roles. One was a tutor and the other a peer. Tutor, is in an authority position, so I thought the distance would be farther than that of a close friend; whereas, a peer is on equal terms, so the distance would be at a closer range like that of a friend. As a result, Personal Space within a session is ambiguous. I decided to test the theory of Personal Space to not only find out what is the appropriate space for a session, but also to observe the types of effects that it would have on an individual (whether male or female), and the behaviors that would result as I invaded the space. I used Hall’s spatial zones as a reference while conducting my experiment. Since my experiment was in the Writing Center during a session, I had to shrink Hall’s spatial zones to fit with the space that was provided for me to work with. The sessions took place at a table, which consisted of four chairs. During a usual tutoring session the tutor sits in the chair next to the student but not in her personal space. Students generally sit in what I considered their personal zone. To be in their Intimate space one would have to move the chair closer to them. The other option would be to sit across the table from them. This I considered to be their Social Space. The other chair was blocked off so they could not sit there (with books and such), and I did not experiment with the Public Space since I felt it would not be applicable. I took observational notes while I was experimenting so that I could mark every expression or interpretation I saw as they arose. After the session was over I decided to give them questionnaires so they could write their feelings and also so I could get their own interpretation of the affect it had when I invaded their space.

I had decided on gradually invading the personal space of my tutees. The first student I experimented with was a female. I planned to have her sit down before I did, but she came in while I was already seated. After she sat down, I moved to the next chair farther away from her. She immediately looked up from her paper and made eye contact with me. She seemed to wonder why I moved away but eventually blew it off. Her voice was shaky while reading her paper aloud and she seemed reserved. She held her paper close to her and kept within her own little corner of space (even though there was plenty of space available). I began to think that when I moved away from her I had hurt her feelings. Regardless I continued the session. She did not look to me like she thought she had my full attention. I was not leaning in, but just sitting in my chair listening to her paper. I decided it was time to move to the next chair. This put me in her personal space. She began to loosen up and showed less discomfort. Since this was where tutors usually sit maybe she felt at ease. I decided to take it to the next step and I edged my way closer to her. She amazingly did not seem to mind. She continued acting as she did before; I closed in on her. Maybe I’m not close enough I thought. I edged in further until I was so close that if I moved an inch I would have taken her spot in the chair. After the session was over, I handed her the questionnaire to fill out while I filled out my fellow report form. She indicated that she believed that everyone has his or her own personal space. When she was to explain what she thought was her own comfortable personal space when interacting with an individual she said, “As long as someone I just met came up and put their hand on my shoulder. I am comfortable” (Writing Center). This may explain why she was not bothered when I invaded her space. She has a bigger personal space than some individuals, completely comfortable with a stranger touching her shoulder. She also claimed that she would feel more uncomfortable if a man invaded her space as opposed to a women, and when I asked why she said because she would be afraid of the man’s intentions. When I discussed what I was trying to do she claimed that she did not like it when I was across the table because there wasn’t as much contact as she desired. She showed this in her actions by being nervous and reserved when I was far away. When I was closer she loosened up and she claimed later that she felt completely comfortable when I was beside her (Personal Zone) and even when I was extremely close (Intimate Zone). Clearly she had a bigger personal space than I did. After all, I think I was more uncomfortable invading her space then she was being invaded.

The other two students I tutored during this experiment were males. I went about the situation the exact same way as I did with the female. The only difference was the males sat down before me. I did each of these sessions independently, but the answers and observations I obtained for the experiments on the males were quite similar. There were a few differences of course with their reactions to the experiment. Neither one liked it when I was across the table. While one claimed that it felt as if I were to far away, the other said that he did not like it because it felt like he had to yell to get my attention. Both were trying to say that they did not like it while I was far away but used different ways to get the message across. These different perceptions were evident not only in the answers to the questionnaire but also through observing them. One felt at ease during the session going about it as he normally would, but with a specific preference for the seating arrangement. The others’ facial expressions showed resentment when I sat across from him as if he did not think he was getting my full attention. He attempted to lean in across the table and when I was not reciprocating he became irritated. As I moved to the Personal zone and then to the Intimate he became at ease. Since I was closer it seemed as if he was beginning to feel that he had my attention, even though he had it all along. I did not feel uncomfortable when invading the personal space of the males. They also did not mind when I was close to them invading their space. In fact, just like the female they felt more at ease when I was closer then when I was far away. I asked them if they would be more uncomfortable if a woman invaded their space as opposed to a man. Both replied that they would be more uncomfortable if a man invaded their space. They had the same answer as the female but I’m sure for different reasons.

Doing this experiment was a worthwhile experience. It enabled me to see the different reactions people have to their invasion of space. I was not only able to observe and interpret their reactions, but also was able to see if I was right—by reading their responses and discussing them. Everyone does in fact have his or her own Personal Space. When it is invaded, the reactions can vary widely, but everyone is affected by personal space whether they realize it or not. Even I was affected by personal space when conducting my experiment. It seems that the preferred space for a tutoring session is within the Personal and Intimate Zone, but every situation is different. It is important to remember that Personal Space exists, and it is involved in our everyday interactions. Now when someone backs away from you during a conversation you will know why.

Works Cited

Edupass.org. “The SmartStudent Guide to Studying in the USA.” FinAid Page 1999. Pub. Mark Kantrowitz. 22 Oct. 2003.      
      <http://www.edupass.org/culture/personalspace.phtml>. 

Geocities.com. “Personal Space.” Owl Magazine 2001. 22 Oct. 2003. <http://www.geocities.com/thesciencefiles/personal/      space.html>.

Jazwinski. “Chapter 8: Personal Space and Territoriality.” 22 Oct. 2003. <http://condor.stcloudstate.edu/~jaz/psy373/      personalspace.html>.

Stewart, Susan. “Too Close for Comfort?” Current Health 2: A Weekly Reader Publication. Monroe County Community Library.      Monroe MI. Infotrac. Health Reference Center-Academic. Dec.1992.19.4. 26 Nov. 2003.

Kilbury, Robert, James Bordieri, Henry Wong. “Impact of Physical Disability and Gender on Personal space.”
     The Journal of Rehabilitaion. Monroe County Community Library. Monroe MI. Infotrac. Health Reference Center-Academic.
      Apr.-June 1996. 62.2. 26 Nov. 2003.

Writing Center. Monroe County Community College. Monroe, Michigan. 2003.

 

 

Optimism Builds Confidence in the Writing Center
Kelli Massa

Many students who enter the MCCC Writing Center lack confidence in their writing abilities. I discovered this my first day of tutoring and decided one goal I had for myself with tutoring would be to help students become more confident in themselves and their writing. It is common for students to become nervous and begin to doubt themselves during a tutoring conference. Some students have lost faith in themselves and sought out a writing tutor as a last resort to save their papers. Tutors must encourage students so they are able to complete the tasks at hand. Through research I conducted, along with my own experience in the Writing Center, I found that an optimistic (positive) approach works best when building a student’s confidence during a conference. The optimistic approach I use involves three steps: creating a positive environment, giving students positive reinforcement, and encouraging students to take charge of their work.

Tutors set the scene of the conference through the environment. The environment includes the overall atmosphere of the room along with the mood of the interaction. A conference beginning with a tutor who is optimistic about the outcome will affect the environment and those involved in the conference. In The Allyn and Bacon Guide to Peer Tutoring, Dell Hymes uses the SPEAKING acronym to analyze a tutoring session. This model discusses both the atmosphere of the room, “setting and scene,” and the mood of the conference, the “key.” While tutors cannot control the actual set up of the room, they can control the mood of the interaction (132). When I observed Writing Fellow Arwada Nichols conference, I noticed she set the mood immediately. She was tutoring two female students, Amy and Paula, for an assignment they were working on together. Arwada tutored Amy on a regular basis, but had never tutored Paula. When they entered the Writing Center, Arwada greeted them and started a conversation. She focused on becoming acquainted with Paula since she already knew Amy fairly well. Although tutoring two students at the same time seems challenging, Arwada remained optimistic, which helped the students to be optimistic also. At the beginning of the conference the students appeared to be a little unsure of their ideas, but by the end they were confident in their abilities to complete the assignment and excited to get started. I think because Arwada was optimistic and set a positive mood for the conference, Amy and Paula’s confidence improved by the end of the conference.

Working with students who are required to come to a conference and do not wish to participate challenges tutors and is often a tutor’s worst nightmare. This situation challenges them to remain optimistic, which is often difficult. Through my own experience, I have found when I am optimistic about the outcome of what seems like a nightmare, it will turn out to be a great conference. Having a positive attitude can make all the difference in almost any situation. I had an appointment with a student, Ryan, who was required to come see me for his assignment. Ryan entered the writing center almost ten minutes late, threw his paper on the table, sat in the chair, and crossed his arms. I felt this would be a difficult conference if I did not do anything to prevent it from happening. Therefore, I decided to be more enthusiastic than usual during the conference to compensate for Ryan’s lack of enthusiasm. When Ryan took a seat, I introduced myself, tried to break the ice with a joke, and started to ask Ryan questions about the assignment. We discussed the paper and engaged in the best conference I have had. By the end Ryan was doing all of the talking, he was optimistic about the outcome of the paper, and confident he could get the job done. Positively reinforcing the work a student has done will often build her confidence. Every time I have a conference, I begin my telling the student what I like the most about the paper and congratulate her on a job well done. Tutors positively reinforcing students’ hard work and effort in the beginning will make them want to listen for what else they may have to say as the session continues. This also builds confidence because it tells students they are on the right track, which encourages them to continue and try to do better. Writing Fellow Jenna Koch always tries to find some way to positively reinforce students. Jenna stated, “I think it is so important to let the student know about the things that they do well, as well as the things they needs to improve upon” (par. 1).

When a tutor attempts to remain positive during a conference it is sometimes difficult to point out errors in the writing. Furthermore, if a tutor begins by positively reinforcing the work followed by discussing the points to improve on, students will see the difference between what was done well and what needs improvement. An approach I use while tutoring is having students compare a well-written part of the paper with something that needs improvement. I used this approach on Ryan during the same conference previously mentioned. He arranged a particular paragraph in the paper in a very effective way. It was packed with details, but not overflowing, and also fit well into the context of the paper. I pointed out this paragraph to Ryan and described why I thought it was a great paragraph. When it came time to discuss points for improvement, paragraph development was one of the points. I used Ryan’s own well developed paragraph as an example of how a paragraph should be developed. Since this was his own work, Ryan had a better understanding of what a well developed paragraph should be. Also, Ryan became more confident in his writing through this exercise because he knew he had the ability to improve the paper. This exercise allows students to find the errors themselves, instead of the tutor pointing them out. Furthermore, through finding their own mistakes students build confidence to in their work.

Although tutors lead students during the conference, it is important for students to take an active role in the conference according to The Allyn and Bacon Guide to Peer Tutoring (53). Students must take responsibility for their work during a conference. Jenna Koch likes relating student problems to ones she has experienced, so they know everyone has these problems and they are not alone (par. 2). While in the beginning of a conference the tutor may do most of the talking through asking question, by the end of the conference the student should be doing almost all of the talking. I find being optimistic and encouraging students to be confident often results in students doing over half of the talking by the middle of the conference. There were several students I tutored in the Writing Center who seemed nervous and unsure of themselves in the beginning. One student in particular, Mary, sticks out in my mind. Mary came in with a finished research paper, but she thought it was awful and lacked confidence in her writing. The conference began by me asking Mary about her day and trying to make her laugh. Then I asked questions so I could access what Mary’s needs were at that point in the writing process. I came to the conclusion Mary was revising and desperately needed to cut material in the paper, Mary agreed. Then I asked Mary “Is there anything you can find in the paper that is redundant or unnecessary?” Mary answered, “I don’t know what to do. Can you cut it out for me?” I knew I had to find a way to show Mary she could do this, so I put my theory about optimism building confidence to work. First, I already set the scene as a positive environment from the second Mary came into the writing center. Next I needed to compliment, or positively reinforce, her work. As Mary read parts of her paper I noticed a well-written section which was both effective and to the point. After she was finished reading I made several positive comments on her writing, including the section I noticed. Afterwards, I had to convince Mary to take charge of her work. I asked her to read a redundant and unclear section I noticed in the paper then the well-written section. When Mary read the two sections she smiled and said, “Wow, there is so much information I should cut from this part.” By maintaining a positive outlook and encouraging Mary to have confidence, she was able to take charge of her work and have confidence in her own abilities.

Through the research I conducted, along with comments from other Writing Fellows, being optimistic affects not only the students’ confidence, but also the entire outcome of the writing conference. Tutors lead the conference and their attitudes will affect students and the entire interaction. When tutors bring a positive attitude into the writing conference, they will have positive results.

Works Cited

Gillespie, Paula, and Neal Lerner. The Allyn and Bacon Guide to Peer Tutoring. 2nd ed. New York: Pearson Educ., Inc., 2003.

Koch, Jenna. E-mail Interview. 5 Dec. 2003.

Nichols, Arwada. Writing Center Tutoring Conference. 9 Dec. 2003.

 

The Five Paragraph Theme Model: Help or Hinder
Arwada Nichols

Students writing an academic paper unknowingly forget organization. Often students use prewriting or they begin drafting as soon as ideas flow from their thoughts. The only problem is that prewriting strategies are for the initial stages of writing. Prewriting helps students find ideas and organize the ideas; however, it does not give complete structure for the writing process. The drafting technique does not work organizationally because ideas do not normally flow from student’s thoughts in a specific order. Without order, unity, and cohesiveness students fail to communicate their ideas, resulting in an incomplete paper. The five-paragraph theme model is an unintentional product resulting from teachers preparing students for state assessment testing. The model allows students to organize their papers in a specific order while maintaining unity and cohesiveness. Unfortunately, the model is not appropriate for all papers. The model causes controversy among teachers and professional writers. While some use the model others disagree because of the structural limitations. Agreeing the model has limitations, Monroe County Community College Writing Fellows use the model successfully when tutoring student peers. The success at MCCC is attributed to the methods in which the model is introduced to students. In addition, MCCC Writing Fellows awareness of the styles limitations allows them to use the organization the model encompasses, without rigorously following the model.

Many teachers believe the structured model was developed through the evolutionary process. Elementary and middle-school teachers felt pressured to increase students’ scores on state education aptitude tests. The prompts never actually stated that students must know the model; however, a seventh grade teacher believes the scoring “rubric” of the standardized test, and the pressure to teach children to write based on the scoring brought about the model (Moss par. 6). Attentive teachers knew students needed to learn order, cohesiveness, and unity to write successfully (Moss par. 6). Teachers examined different methods and started teaching children to use five paragraphs, thus becoming The Five Paragraph Theme Model. The first paragraph in the model is the introduction, which introduces the main idea with a strong thesis statement. In addition the writer uses this area to capture the readers attention. Next, the model contains three body paragraphs. Each body paragraph is lead by a strong topic sentence and one main idea supporting the thesis in the introduction. Finally, the model ends with a conclusion paragraph. The conclusion paragraph restates the thesis and the supporting body paragraphs. The conclusion is important, especially in academic papers because it is the writers’ last chance to convince the reader of the paper’s value. If a paper is longer or shorter the format still works as long as writers follow the structure and use a recognizable order of ideas. However, the use of the five-paragraph theme model is controversial among educators and experienced writers.

While a number of teachers and experienced writers use the model, many disagree with the format. Glenda Moss taught the model to her elementary students; later in her career she realized “overemphasis” on the model made children think it was the only way to write. The model did not prepare the students for higher education (2). The Dartmouth College website suggests, “each idea must find it’s own form” and a good idea will find a form (pars. 2 and 3). In contrast, Kathleen Sullivan, author of Paragraph Practice: Writing the Paragraph and The short Composition states, “The thesis statement gives an exact plan, and the discussion must follow it exactly” (155). Despite the controversy writers using the five-paragraph theme model will always have a flowing paper focusing on the main idea. However, the model does not always fit every theme. The format does not usually lend itself to poetry. For example a sonnet consist of a fourteen-line format and free verse does not have any format. In addition, papers with suspenseful themes generally have the thesis at the end instead of the beginning. The Composition Center, a website for Dartmouth College discusses the idea that if a teacher asked students to write a paper on “Hamlet’s indecision” the five-paragraph theme is ridiculous (par. 3). The model does not work well for newspaper or magazine articles. They require a creative introduction to lure a reader into the story. The model is very repetitious unlike a newspaper or magazine article. Agreeing the model has limits; the Monroe County Community College Writing Fellows use the method for peer tutoring.

The five-paragraph theme model is an essential tool in the tutoring process. MCCC Writing Fellows responded positively when questioned about the model (Nichols 1). Although, one question respondent disliked the conclusion, explaining it was difficult for students to understand (Nichols 1). In contrast, one questioned respondent likes the model because it breaks complicated ideas into “manageable tasks” (Nichols 1). The success of the model is contributed to the method in which a tutor guides a student and how the student responds. Sullivan discusses, writers without a lot of experience fail to see the “connection between the thesis” and the content (155). Some questioned respondents gave analogies of the model—relating the model to a road map that allows students to learn the format. To illustrate, during the introduction the writers tell where they are going, the body explains what they are going to do when they get there, and during the conclusion the writers explain what the whole trip was like (Nichols 1). When student’s papers fail to have structure, the Five Paragraph Theme model gives ample structure. In addition, when they are confused about supporting a thesis, the model allows the tutors to ask helpful questions. For instance, what evidence do you have to support your thesis? Upon responding, students have their first body-paragraph topic sentence. The model allows students to visualize the five parts interacting with one another. Students having achieved the goal of knowing how to support a thesis without the model, or assignments not allowing the use of the model, a tutor will then guide them through a more creative process.

The five-paragraph theme model is a useful tool in the tutoring process. Often students do not have their papers organized, the format allows students to structure their paper without drifting from the thesis. Unfortunately, the model does not work for all papers. Creative pieces and suspenseful themes do not work well with the model. Because the model becomes repetitious, it rarely structures newspaper and magazine articles. The model is controversial among teachers and experienced writers because it restrains the writers. Monroe County Community College Writing fellows agree the model limits the creativeness of a writer; however, it is an essential tool in the tutoring process. Tutors use different methods in teaching the model. Examples of methods are analogies or dividing one large task into small individual tasks. The model works well as a visual guide to organization. Nevertheless, students need to explore other formats of writing after accomplishing established unity between thesis and ideas. Writer Tina Blue states, “Like training wheels, the five paragraph theme needs to be abandoned once it has served its purpose” (Essay, I Say par. 2).

Works Cited

Composition Center. Dept. home page. Dartmouth Coll. 18 Nov. 2003 <http://dartmouth.edu>.      

Essay, I Say. Ed. Tina Blue. Jan. 2001. 22 Oct. 2003 http://www.essayisay.homestead.com>.       

Moss, Glenda. “The Five-Paragraph Theme.” National Writing Project 2002. 2 Nov. 2003. <http:www.writingproject.org>.

Nichols, Arwada. Writing Fellow Questionairre. Nov. 2003.

Sullivan, Kathleen E. Paragraph Practice: Writing The Paragraph and The Short Composition. 6th ed. New York: Macmillan, 1989.

 

 

Tutoring and the Socratic Method
Christian Peltier

The Socratic Method is one of the strategies used by tutors in their craft. This method is named after the philosopher Socrates, who taught his students by answering their questions with more questions to incite deeper thinking on their part. Tutors have since adopted this style of questioning tutees to draw out the answers in lieu of giving them the answers outright. The benefit of tutoring this way is that the tutee learns the answer on his own, hence promoting "ownership." Moreover, the tutee learns better when the Socratic Method is applied. However, questioning alone does not always help in the tutoring experience. While giving the answer to a tutee is not the ideal practice, sometimes the tutor must relent and do exactly that. Also, if the method is done incorrectly, the tutee will be confused, with little progress made. Just like anything else, the Socratic Method must be applied properly to be successful. This is accomplished by determining the questions to be asked, deciding whether the tutee knows the answers, and directing the questions for the best results.

When a tutoring session is based around questioning, some thought must be given to the questions asked. According to Lori Moore and Rick Rudd, the Socratic-questioning model is divided into four sections:

1. Origin and source
2. Support, reasons, evidence, and assumptions
3. Conflicting views
4. Implications and consequences (1)

These sections provide the pool from which the tutor's questions can be drawn, with the intent of getting the tutee to show what he knows about the subject. Moreover, anticipating answers is another element of the process. Expecting a given answer assists in the forming of further questions, thereby helping to quicken the pace. If the tutor pauses for a length of time to consider the next question, the tutee becomes disinterested and loses the initial drive of the session.

This happened in my first attempt at using the Socratic Method in one of my tutoring sessions with a student named Trevor. I felt confident that I could draw the answers from him by asking questions only. However, his answers were vague and hedging, as if he did not know the answer. I continued to ask questions, but Trevor did not have the answers I desired. The pauses grew long indeed as I waited for him to answer my questions. I could see him becoming uncomfortable, and I began to do so as well. The Allyn and Bacon Guide to Peer Tutoring says it is important "knowing that sometimes our questions take time to answer and having the patience to wait for the writer to come up with a reply," (26-7). However, one of the goals for the tutor is creating a comfortable atmosphere for the tutee. To break the tension, I started hinting at the answers, and he responded favorably in kind. This led me to the conclusion that if the tutee does not have the answers initially, then no amount of questioning will produce them.

The tutee must be taught before he can provide answers. "Something has to be there first [for the Socratic Method to work] . . . only then can critical thinking take place," says Doctor James DeVries, professor of history and anthropology at Monroe County Community College. If the tutee has not been taught or, heavens forbid, did not pay attention in class, then the answers will not be waiting to be drawn out. The answers must be placed in the tutee by direct teaching. Once the tutee has been taught, then he will be receptive to the Socratic Method. In cases like Trevor's, some teaching must be combined with the tutoring to make the session work. However, the tutor must be careful to let the tutee do the work, and not to just give the answers. By hinting and showing the tutee where to find answers, the tutor stays within the moral code of tutoring.

But questions remain the driving force behind the Socratic Method. Only by questioning the tutee can the tutor determine if the answers are truly there or not. Moreover, by coaxing the answers out of the tutee in this manner, it provides that all-important aspect of writing: ownership. The goal of the tutor is not to do the work for the tutee, but for the tutee to claim the work and place his distinctive mark upon it. The Socratic Method helps the tutee to "own" the paper because it actively involves the tutee in the process (Elkind 56). Involving the tutee in this way usually makes him or her enthusiastic about any progress being made and eager to continue.

This was made apparent in another tutoring session, with Stacey. She had to write a speech about her hometown and what it meant to her, so I started by asking her what she liked about where she grew up. She told me that she liked how she grew up within a mile of everyone that was important to her. I then asked how that influenced her as a person. As I continued to ask questions that pertained to her, hence "involving" her with the paper, she became more passionate with what she was doing. I feel this was because she truly had a sense of "owning" her paper, which probably gave her a good feeling.
However, when a session is going well, one must be wary of another problem. The danger of going off on unrelated tangents is always present when questioning a tutee. Therefore the tutor is responsible for directing the questions so the answers remain relevant to the subject. This should not be a problem as long as the tutor stays focused on the matter and does not allow the tutee to stray. Perhaps the easiest way to do this is by keeping the assignment sheet in mind as well as the topic when posing the questions to the tutee via the Socratic Method.

The Socratic Method is a valuable tool for all tutors. If used correctly, it will improve the tutoring session for both the tutor and the tutee. Not only does this method create a sense of satisfaction in the tutee when he develops the answer himself, it also fosters a feeling of accomplishment in the tutor. I believe in the Socratic Method, as it applies to tutoring, for I have witnessed it in action. Before I started tutoring, I never knew that questions could be as effective a teaching tool as just giving the answers. Moreover, it gives the learner pride in doing something on his own. I think the Socratic Method is a viable teaching tool, and I will continue to use it long after my tutoring days are finished.

Works Cited

DeVries, James. Personal Interview. 4 Dec. 2003.

Elkind, David H. and Freddy Sweet. "The Socratic Approach to Character Education." Educational Leadership 54 (1997): 56-59.

Gillespie, Paula and Neal Lerner. The Allyn Bacon Guide to Peer Tutoring. 2nd ed. New York: Pearson Education, 2004.

Moore, Lori and Rick Rudd. "Using Socratic Questioning in the Classroom." The Agricultural Education Magazine
     Nov-Dec 2002. 5 Dec 2003. <http//www.infotrac.galegroup.com/>.

 

The Complete Online Writing Lab: Making OWLs Fly
Marie Strang

Owls are graceful birds that efficiently capture the resources they need. Online writing labs, also called OWLs, ought to attempt to emulate their namesakes by becoming more efficient in how they operate and offering a greater variety of services. To attain this goal, online writing centers must be self-contained while still complementing their brick-and-mortar counterparts. Modern technologies are redefining literacy, and writing centers need to offer resources to reflect these new definitions. A variety of tools— forums, e-mail, online chat rooms, and other methods—can help sites become more useful to students. The responses gathered from a questionnaire I distributed reflect students’ opinions about these tools. There are advantages and disadvantages to online writing centers; however, a well-structured site can provide valuable services to students. I envision the ideal online writing lab as a community where people can collect and share resources and learn to make their writing take flight as effortlessly as an owl.

Online writing centers are not merely supplements for centers in physical locations— they must stand on their own. They need to be more than just pointers to their brick-and-mortar counterparts (Johnson, par. 3). Many online writing labs are not used to full potential. In her article “Pr(owl)ing Around,” Jane Lasarenko defines three types of online writing labs. The first type, OWLs that “serve as advertisements” for a physical location, are “at the bottom rung” (par. 2). A little higher on the “evolutionary ladder” is the second type, “OWLs that offer onsite tutoring services with specific writing tips, style guides, and other helpful writing instructions online with links to other OWLs and information” (par. 2). The third type, at the “top of the current evolutionary scale”, is “OWLs that offer complete set of online services, including online manuscript submission and feedback (par. 2).

The three types of OWLs—advertisements, writing guides, and complete sites—are only part of the modern literary picture. The definitions for writing and reading are evolving and expanding. Modern students use an extended range of new communication methods.

Writing is no longer limited to print materials. Writing labs usually center on personal conferences focused on a printed paper. Face-to-face conferences are important, but writing centers must expand to include new paradigms. The younger generation, who grew up with technology, is comfortable and familiar with the Internet. Writing centers must accommodate this age group, which could be called the Multimedia Generation. Their world goes beyond the printed word to include graphics, audio, video, and modern interactions. J. Paul Johnson, of the University of Minnesota, tells us in his article “Writing Spaces,” that new types of communications are “reshaping understandings of literate behavior” (par. 5). He refers to a Web site of the University of Missouri-Columbia called The Writery, which establishes “richer contexts for writing than those prescribed in the proscenium classroom” (par. 6). The Writery is an example of how a writing center serves to question “the ideology of print” and creates a place where “literary behavior” is renegotiated (par. 7). Brick-and-mortar locations can work in conjunction with Web sites to support this expanded view of literacy. The Kairos online journal recognizes the need to “bridge the gap between print and digital publishing cultures” (Kairos, par. 3). Online writing centers provide a perfect medium for bridging this gap.

I created a questionnaire and distributed it in the Writing Center. The responses reflect the importance of using both face to face tutoring and online tutoring to meet the needs of all students. Out of eleven responses to the questionnaire, five students wrote they preferred face-to face tutoring. Out of those five, four stated their interest in an online writing community that features message boards, chat rooms, and instant messaging. Six students preferred instant messaging. One suggested voice chat would be a good option as it makes the session more personal. Another student mentioned chat rooms “allow people to communicate outside of LAL hours.” See table 1.

Writing centers must keep up with the needs of modern students. Expanded definitions of literacy encompass a range of online tools. These tools have advantages and disadvantages; yet will remain an integral part of new forms of communication.

Online chats, instant messaging, message board forums, and e-mail provide useful tools for online tutoring, allowing students the benefits of a writing center outside the campus location’s hours, although each method includes advantages and disadvantages. Online chats and instant messaging are synchronous communication methods, the advantages of which, according to Clive Shepard, include instant response (Real-time par. 4). Disadvantages include lack of time to compose a message and no record of the communication. These methods require people to be available at the same time (Real-time par. 5). E-mail and message board forums are

Table 1

 
Online Writing Center Questionnaire Results        
Number Who:

Yes

No

N/A

 
Looked at site

6

---

5

 
Found site useful and informative

5

4

2

 
Used or will use e-mail tutoring

---

11

---

 
Would use chats, message boards, IMs

7

1

3

 
*Note: Total number of respondents is eleven.  


asynchronous communication methods. These methods are advantageous for a number of reasons: they allow time to compose messages, there is a record of the message, and both parties are not required to be present at the same time (Shepard, Asynchronous par. 7). Slower response time and difficulty in getting emotions across are disadvantages of these methods (Shepard, Asynchronous par. 8). While these are points of consideration when evaluating what services to include in a site, all forms of online communication share one advantage: because they are not face-to-face, they nearly eliminate prejudice based on appearance, race, and gender.
Whereas online tools have distinct advantages and disadvantages, they are integral to modern communication. A well-designed site makes online tools easier to use. A good layout also makes it easier for students to access the resources the site offers. Such sites enhance their campus locations.

An important consideration when designing an OWL is structure. A well-structured site will complement, but also stand on its own from, the actual writing center. Moderators, forums, and groups will make a Web site self-contained yet still related to the actual writing center. Moderators can coordinate writing center content with Web site content and facilitate groups and forums (Amill, par. 4). Each department can have a forum—English, Business, Humanities, Biology, History, Political Science, and so on. Each forum can be divided into groups—tutors, tutors and tutees, and student study groups. Salt Lake Community College’s site, Peer Centered, provides online space for tutors to communicate with each other via journal entries. Excelsior College offers online study groups and helps people find study partners.

Good site layout includes easy navigation, search capabilities, online, resources and submission forms. The Online Writing Lab has a search box and drop down menu boxes at the top of its page, making it easy for visitors to find information quickly and at any time. The site offers an extensive collection of “printable” materials so people may access information offline. Some sites provide submission forms. Such forms give tutors the information they need to begin a working relationship with students and provide records of the conference. The Sweetland site, run by the University of Michigan, includes a good example of a submission form. See figure 1.


Figure 1. Online submission form for University of Michigan’s Sweetland site. (See http://www.lsa.umich.edu/swc/help/owl.html).

The form gathers the same information as the forms used in face-to-face sessions, thus allowing the tutor to offer better online assistance while providing convenient help to the student.

Well-ordered Web sites offer students important services. While student’s opinions of online tutoring vary, they want the advantages and conveniences of the tools available at Web sites. Twenty-first century technologies are influencing our ideas about literacy. Writing centers must keep up with these new ideas. Online writing centers must complement campus locations, but also stand on their own. By using the right combination of technology, on and offline interaction, and cooperation, OWLs can take flight.

Works Cited

Amill, Laura. “Telementoring: A View from the Facilitator’s Screen.” Virtual Engineering Project. 2000. U of Texas. 4
     Dec. 2003. <http://www.serviceleader.org/old/vv/direct/laura.html>.
    
Excelsior College. “Electronic Peer Network.” Online Learning Resources. 2003. Excelsior College. 4 Dec. 2003.      <http://www.excelsior.edu/ls_onlrs.htm>.

Johnson, J. Paul. “Writing Spaces.” OWLs Web. 4 Dec. 2003. <http://english.ttu.edu/kairos/1.1/owls/johnson.html>.

Kairos. Douglas Eyman and James A. Inman, eds., et. al. 8.1 (2003) 4 Dec. 2003. <http://english.ttu.edu/kairos/>.

Lasarenko, Jane. “Pr(owl)ing Around.” OWLs Web. 4 Dec. 2003. <http://english.ttu.edu/kairos/1.1/owls/Lasarenko/prowl.html>.

OWL. 2003. Purdue U. 4 Dec. 2003. <http://owl.english.purdue.edu/>.

OWLs Lab. “Online Writing Labs.” Lee Honeycutt and Amy Hanson, eds. 4 Dec. 2003. <http://english.ttu.edu/kairos/      1.1/owls/owlfront.html>.

Peer Centered. 26 Nov. 2003. Salt Lake Community College. 4 Dec. 2003. <http://bessie.englab.slcc.edu/pc/>.

Shepard, Clive. “The Asynchronous Online Tutor.” 2000. Fastrak Consulting. 3 Dec. 2003.<http://www.fastrak-consulting.co.uk/      tactix/Features/asynch/asynch.htm>.

---. “The Real-time Online Tutor.” 2000. Fastrak Consulting. 3 Dec. 2003. <http://www.fastrak-consulting.co.uk/      tactix/Features/realtime/realtime.htm>.

Sweetland. “How to Submit Papers to OWL.” 2003. U of Michigan. 3 Dec. 2003. <http://www.lsa.umich.edu/swc/help/owl.html>.


 

Prewriting: Step-by-Step
Sarah Thompson

How many times have we, as tutors, heard the phrase “I just do not know how to get started.” Probably more times than we can actually count. For almost every writer, experienced or inexperienced, generating ideas is usually the most difficult aspect when writing a paper. This process of generating ideas is called prewriting. Just as there are different styles for each writer, there are also different types of prewriting. Here are five types of prewriting : brainstorming, freewriting, looping, outlining, and clustering. Prewriting should be viewed as the first step in the long process of writing, and is of the utmost importance to the working writer. As writers, it is important for us to experiment with each different type of prewriting to find out which of the five works the best for us. Among these, the most popular among MCCC students seems to be outlining, brainstorming, and clustering.

Outlining is a very clear and concise way of arranging research material that the writer has collected into a cohesive manner. Using outlining as a prewriting strategy works well for students after they have already done preliminary research on the subject at hand. Tobey Fulwiler stresses this point in his book The Working Writer. Fulwiler states that when a student creates an outline, he or she is forced to structure his or her ideas (62). This technique works well in conjunction with the research process. I myself use outlining for this purpose, and I always recommend this strategy to the tutees I help who are writing research papers as well. This is because outlines not only organize thoughts and statistics, but they also make it easier to rearrange thoughts and statistics, if the writer chooses to do so. Fulwiler agrees with this when he says, “Outlines are most useful if you modify them as you write in accordance to new thoughts or information” (62). One student I encountered swears by outlines. She informed me that by outlining she is able to get a mental picture of what her paper is going to look like and what the general flow should be.

The flip side of this strategy is that writers may feel pressured to stick to the outline at all costs. This can make the writer feel trapped and may interrupt his or her creativity in a way that would actually hinder the flow of ideas. The writer using an outline needs to realize that the outline is merely a guide, and is not set in stone. If an idea or fact fits better in a different section than the writer anticipated, the outline format is versatile enough so that it can be rearranged if so desired. Most students using outlining as their prewriting strategy use it for this reason alone. It helps them to rearrange ideas to better suit their thesis statement and makes for an overall better paper. Fulwiler says “Moving entries around is especially easy if you are using a computer, because you can see many combinations before committing yourself to any one of them” (62).

The next prewriting strategy that I have investigated is brainstorming. In her online article, “The Pen and the Sword: How to Make the Writing Process Work for You,” M. Linkens describes brainstorming as a technique which has writers jotting down all ideas that come to them. This technique is most useful to the writer when he or she is having trouble deciding on what to concentrate on in the paper. By brainstorming and recording all ideas, the writer is able to have a wide variety of concepts to choose from. Linkens makes it abundantly clear that “brainstorming is also known as ‘fast writing’ because the writer seeks to record as many ideas as possible without sorting or evaluating them.”

I encountered a perfect candidate for this prewriting strategy at the MCCC Writing Center. This person had been assigned a topic for a paper, but had very little prior knowledge about this topic. This individual was daunted by the task at hand, and had no way of knowing where to start. I advised the individual to simply talk to me about the subject and what little he did know about it. Simply by talking to me, he was able to generate enough ideas on to paper to develop a bit of a game plan in his head. A previously unattainable assignment now seemed manageable enough to this person. I also strongly suggested to this person that he should organize his thoughts in the form of an outline to have the most positive outcome for his paper.

Another technique very similar to brainstorming is clustering. In clustering, the writer puts a word in a circle and then arranges ideas in way so that they “branch off” from the word that is in the circle. This technique works well for writers who are visual learners and need something in print to be able to relate to it. I would recommend this technique to a person who has been assigned a very broad topic to explain. By using clustering, writers would be able to see major topics and subtopics to explain the ideas that they have chosen to write about.

Through a survey I conducted at the MCCC Writing lab, I was able to discover that the majority of the students surveyed realized the need for a prewriting strategy. All those surveyed were able to state which strategy they used, and why. Among the most popular strategies stated—outlining, brainstorming and clustering—the most popular of them was brainstorming. I found it very refreshing that the students had the knowledge about the need for prewriting. Without it, a writer cannot possibly have a well-written paper.

Prewriting should not be overlooked. It is the first step in the long road of the writing process. A writer should not become cynical if he or she has not yet found a strategy that works. By practicing each type, the writer will eventually find one that works the best. All strategies produce the same result, which is a plan of attack for the assignment at hand. The student will begin to feel most comfortable as writer once the “correct” strategy is discovered. Until that time I encourage each and every writer I encounter to simply try each type until he or she finds the most comfortable fit.

Works Cited

Fulwiler, Tobey. The Working Writer. 4th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2002.

Linkens, M. “The Pen and the Sword: How to Make the Writing Process Work For You.” Law Enforcement Bulletin. Fall 2003.
      First Search. Monroe County Community College, Monroe MI. Nov 2003.  <http://firstsearch.oclc.org>.       

Personal Survey. Nov 2003.

 

Prewriting Strategies
Shari Wheeler

What are my ideas? What am I going to write about? Many writers are faced with these questions as they begin an assignment. Sometimes, writers find it just as difficult to think of a topic as writing the entire paper. Although instructors may sometimes assign a particular topic, writers must still expand on the topic with their own ideas. Writers may or may not have a topic assigned to them, but in either case, they need to generate ideas for the body of their paper. They may find themselves staring at a blank sheet of paper or a blank computer screen. I have experienced this many times while working on an assignment. I found myself struggling with ways to develop ideas. My mind would go blank as soon as I decided to write something down on paper. Having learned about prewriting strategies, I have made it a point to practice them each time I write. The process of generating ideas is an important first step in writing a paper. Prewriting strategies help writers to achieve this first step, by offering suggestions for getting started with creating ideas and putting those ideas together to form a well-structured paper. There are many prewriting strategies to choose from such as freewriting, brainstorming, and clustering. Writers may choose one or more of these strategies depending on what works best for them. There are no rules for prewriting; it allows the writer to combine techniques for positive results. Prewriting strategies such as freewriting, brainstorming, and clustering are effective methods in generating ideas.

Freewriting is a fast paced, continued writing process. To freewrite, one must remember to keep writing. The object of this process is for a writer to continue writing as fast as he or she can, without stopping and to do this for a designated amount of time, such as fifteen minutes. When using this method, a writer should not worry about spelling, punctuation, grammar, or neatness. Instead, he or she should continuously write down every thought that comes to mind. By doing this, the writer has no time to rethink his or her original thoughts. Often a writer becomes critical of his or her own work and tosses it out. Freewriting does not allow this to happen; thus, giving the writer a chance to see every possible idea that evolved. The writer can discover ideas that may have been tucked away and not thought out. If the writer stumbles over words and can only think of such phrases as “Gee, I don’t know what to write,” then he or she would write down that exact phrase. The writer should not stop the writing process for any reason. Writers will find the more they write, the more they will think. Writing requires a lot of thought. The more ideas a writer has, the better thought processes will occur. The actual freewrite may seem like a messy piece of work, but the end results are quite useful. Writers are able to generate many useful ideas through this method.

Brainstorming is a method of listing any thoughts or ideas. Writers can start this process by asking themselves a topic related question and then listing a handful of answers. Purdue University suggests a writer ask the journalist questions: “Who? What? Where? When? Why? How? So What?” to help generate ideas (Plan I sec. A). The writer’s list of answers can be the beginning of ideas for the assignment. If the topic is unknown, a writer can start brainstorming by listing points of interest to see where his or her thoughts are heading. Listing can consist of single words, phrases, or sentences. A writer should jot down their ideas as soon as he or she thinks of them. These ideas can come to mind at the strangest times, but the writer should list them as soon as possible for fear of forgetting them. Michael Harvey’s advice to all writers is “record your thoughts or kiss them goodbye” (par. 5). These ideas can become main sections of the paper or help to emphasize a particular point the writer is trying to make. This method of listing or jotting down ideas at odd times may seem easier to the writer who dislikes sitting for long periods of time trying to think of ideas. This type of writer would not feel the pressures of having to create a full list all at once. He or she could work at a more comfortable pace. Writing is a thinking process, and brainstorming allows this process to take place over a period of time.

Clustering can also be a helpful prewriting strategy for generating ideas. It is a visual tool writers can have fun with as they link together their ideas. Clustering does just that—it links together any related ideas in a visual sort of way. According to Toby Fulwiler, clustering “is a method of listing ideas visually to reveal their relationships” (62). The writer starts this process by writing down one word as a main focal point and drawing a circle around it. The writer then needs to think of other related words and connect them to the focal word by drawing a circle around them and connecting them with a straight line. Writers can think of clustering as webbing or drawing spiders. The focal point, or main word, is considered the body of the spider. The related words are the spider legs, and they connect to the body, or focal point. Clustering is a great way for writers to see if they have enough supportive ideas for the main points of their paper. If the focal point has only one or two related words, the writer needs to add to this or her ideas. Many times, a writer will start the clustering process with just one focal point. As the clustering continues, the writer may find the main idea has branched into many other useful ideas. Seeing the connection of ideas will help a writer expand on certain areas of the paper.

These prewriting strategies are just three of many techniques used by writers. I have tried these three strategies, and I have found them to be very helpful each time I write. I was curious if other writers use these helpful methods, so I conducted a survey asking these four questions:

1. Do you (did you) use any prewriting strategies (methods) such as:
 Listing/Brainstorming, Freewriting, Outlining, Asking the 6 journalist questions: Who, What, Where, When, Why, How, Conversing with others
2. If so, what method(s) do you use?
3. If not, is the reason because you have not tried any of the methods?
4. How do you generate ideas for your writing if you do not use any of these methods?

Out of 17 students surveyed, 12 of them use some sort of prewriting strategy. The 5 students who chose not to use any of the prewriting strategies had not tried any of the strategies. These students preferred to sit at a blank computer screen and start typing. This method seemed to work for them, but with further discussion, I discovered that their work was not always as organized and structured as they would like.

The results of this survey help support the idea of using prewriting strategies to help writers generate their ideas. Writing can be difficult. Why not take advantage of techniques to make things easier? Prewriting strategies help the writing process flow smoothly. Prewriting can help some writers get past the stage they dread the most—getting started.

Works Cited

Fulwiler, Toby. The Working Writer. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson, 2004.

Harvey, Michael. “Generating Ideas.” The Nuts and Bolts of College Writing. 30 Nov. 2003 <http://nutsandbolts.washcoll.edu>.

[Plan 1] “Planning (Invention).” Purdue University Online Writing Lab. 30 Nov. 2003  <http://owl.english.purdue.edu>.

[Plan 2] “Planning (Invention): When You Start to Write.” Purdue University OnlineWriting Lab. 30 Nov. 2003      <http://owl.english.purdue.edu>.

[Plan 3] “Planning (Invention): Thought Starters (Asking the Right Questions).” Purdue University Online Writing Lab. 30
     Nov. 2003 <http://owl.english.purdue.edu>.

 

Silence Speeks Volumes
Jessica Wilson

Non-verbal communication is vital to the world. Imagine a world where everyone could only communicate verbally. The citizens cannot use their hands, their eyes, or any part of their body. Existence in this world would be impossible. Hands can not be used by students wanting to answer questions or people wishing to get a taxi. The people of this world are blind; eyes give too many non-verbal clues. No one can stand, sit, or lie down, as posture is also a part of non-verbal communication. Non-verbal communication is just as important during a tutoring session. Many writers who come to the MCCC Writing Center are reluctant to be there. Getting information from them is like pulling teeth. In this type of session non-verbal communication is our guide. Non-verbal communication is also important in sessions where students talk. It can save time by leaving some questions unasked. The eye contact, nervous behavior, and posture of writer and tutor can reveal what they are unwilling to say. Non-verbal cues tell the tutor how to proceed in the conference. I found these traits in sessions with “Roger” and “Kathy.” I also observed a session between a writer, “Mary” and another tutor. Stepping away from the tutor position allowed me to see things in a different light.

Most students who come to the Writing Center have no reason to trust the tutor initially. Eye contact serves as the basis of honesty, giving the writer a reason to trust. Reaching a comfort level is important as it reinforces the idea of peer tutoring. If writer and tutor are not comfortable with each other nothing will be accomplished. Roger arrived on time and I shook his hand as I greeted him. This is when I established eye contact to build a comfort level. Roger and I began to review his assignment, an opinion paper for which the instructor had provided a list of topics. As he read the list, I noticed he only looked at me as he named certain topics. This told me what interested him. As we divided his choice topics into sub-topics, Roger maintained eye contact. A writer must have confidence in himself as he writes. Roger’s eye contact revealed his high self-esteem that made me confident to move on. M. Hiscock, A. Kendon, and B.B. Meskin agree “Maintaining eye contact in a social situation can be difficult for anyone who is uncomfortable and unsure of oneself […]” (qtd. in “Perception,” par. 19). Eye contact was also a key part of the conference I sat in on. At first I thought the writer, Mary, would be wary of me. She maintained eye contact with both the tutor and me. I saw her eagerness to share and learn in her eyes.

Visiting the Writing Center can be intimidating for some students. These students may be uncomfortable having a stranger read their work. Most writers feel this to a degree, but many are able to mask their feelings. My second writer, Kathy, was not one of those students