Linking Learning Styles with Teaching Styles
Cynthia Conn
The elements of learning, and the way in which students learn, are imperative academically. Matching a students learning style with a professors teaching style has many advantages for the college, the student, and the professor; but all learning styles should be introduced to students, so they will be ready for the challenges in the world. An important point to remember is that education is not something we do to people; education is something people do for themselves (Johnston 6), but by giving students the necessary tools to work with, all students could achieve their goals. Identifying a professors teaching style is inexpensive, and would not be time consuming for the college. Students have variables in their learning styles, which are independent, dependent, competitive, collaborative, avoidant, and participant, so it is important for students to know which learning variable they possess. All students have an element, which makes learning come natural to them. This element is something that is commonplace to the student, or better known as something the student can relate the teaching to in his or her life. The following are the three elements of learning: cognition, conation, and affectation. Along with the elements of learning is the students learning style. The student may be a visual learner, an auditory learner, or a kinesthetic learner. By matching a students learning style with a professors teaching style the student, the professor, and the college have an advantage in many different areas of teaching and learning.
A students learning style has an impact on how well he or she will develop academically. Typically there are six variables to categorize a students learning style. A student may be an independent learner, a dependent learner, a competitive learner, a collaborative learner, an avoidant learner, or a participant learner. The affect these variables have on the student are profound; therefore, the importance of matching a students learning style with a professors teaching style should be top priority to a college. In "Students Learning Styles in Two Classes: Online Distance Learning and Equivalent On-Campus," David P. Diaz and Ryan B. Cartnal state, "Independent learners prefer independent study and self-paced instruction and would prefer to work alone rather than with other students on course projects. Dependent learners look to the teacher and to peers as a source of structure and guidance and prefer an authority figure to tell them what to do. Competitive students learn in order to perform better than their peers and to receive recognition for their academic accomplishments. Collaborative learners acquire information by sharing and cooperating with teachers and peers. They prefer lectures with small-group discussion and group projects. Avoidant learners are not enthusiastic about attending class or acquiring class content. They are typically uninterested and are sometimes overwhelmed by class activities. Participant learners are interested in class activities and discussion and are eager to do as much class work as possible. They are keenly aware of, and have a desire to meet, the teachers expectations" (3-4).
Interesting as though it may seem, a teacher stated, I assumed that my students naturally knew how to follow directions, discern the key facts from the incidental, and complete the assignment (Johnston 1). Many teachers, professors, and tutors assume that students have been exposed to all the learning styles, and although students should be ready for college level instruction, many have not had the different styles introduced.
The elements of learning are essential for a professor or a tutor to know. The three elements of learning are cognition, conation, and affectation. Cognition interprets how we process information, conation defines how we perform learning tasks, and affectation is to develop a sense of self when what a student is working on does not come naturally (Johnston 1). These elements interact in the learning process.
A students learning style is important to the professor as well as to the student. A student needs to determine if he or she is a visual, auditory, or kinesthetic learner. A visual learner writes everything down. An auditory learner listens closely, but rarely writes. A kinesthetic learner likes to work with his or her hands, and will often try to take over teaching. Next there are another four learning styles that should be identified: Sequential, Precise, Technical, and Confluent. A Sequential learner must have a plan to follow, or step by step instructions, and activities should be thoroughly organized. A Precise learner will write detailed notes, and they will ask questions, and need exact answers. A Technical learner needs hands on, and works alone. A Confluent learner takes risks, and will always look for new ways to do a task. They are imaginative (Johnston 2). Testing a student for his or her learning style is not time consuming. A student needs to be tested with the Learning Styles Modality Quiz, and the Learning Combination Inventory. The Learning Styles Modality Quiz can be found in the Learning Assistance Lab. This quiz determines if a students learning style is visual, auditory, or kinesthetic. The next quiz is the Learning Combination Inventory. Figure 1 shows an example of the Learning Combination Inventory. This inventory quizzes students on their learning styles as well, but it encompasses whether a student is a Sequential, a Precise, a Technical, or a Confluent learner. Figure 1 is an example of the Learning Combination Inventory.
These statements are rated on the following scale: (1, Never Ever; 2, Almost Never; 3, Sometimes; 4, Almost Always; 5, Always).
1. I would rather build a project than read or write about a subject.
2. I need clear directions that tell me what is expected of me before I begin a task.
3. I instinctively correct others whose information or answers are not totally accurate.
4. I am willing to risk offering new ideas even in the face of discouragement.
5. I clean up my work area and put things back where they belong as soon as I finish a job.
6. I like hands-on assignments where I get to use mechanical/technical instruments.
7. I ask more questions than most people because I just enjoy knowing things.
Fig. 1. Learning Combination Inventory from Christine A. Johnston. Using the Learning
Combination Inventory. Education. 55 (Dec. 1997 and Jan. 1998): 1-7. Wilson Select Plus.
OCLC First Search. Monroe County Community College Library. Monroe, MI. 30 Oct. 2003.
The colleges, professors, tutors, and students have the advantage when students are tested for their learning styles. By matching a student with a professor who teaches his or her learning style, academic grades, as well as enrollment, could increase. A student once explained to his teacher how her teaching affected him. He said, he wanted to follow instructions, but directions feel like someone putting their hand on my head and pushing down on me all the way through my stomach to the bottom of my feet (Johnston 4). Students learning styles affect their grades. Grades have an affect on a students attitude, and that attitude can stop a student from enrolling in another semester.
Identifying a professors teaching style is inexpensive and would not be time consuming. A letter placed on the semester schedule next to a professors name could indicate his or her teaching style. As students grades increased there could be higher enrollment as well as higher achievement. Testing and documenting a students learning style is advantageous to all writing center tutors. If tutors knew a students learning style, more time could be spent on tutoring and less time spent on assessing.
Although teaching a student by his or her learning style is important, it is imperative that the other styles be introduced as well, so the student is ready for the challenges in the personal and working world. If professors teach exclusively in their students modes, the students may not develop the mental dexterity they need to reach their potential for achievement in school and as professionals (Felder 1). Dr. Holladay (MCCC English) is a perfect example of a professor who uses a variety of teaching styles to teach his students. An independent learner will have the opportunity to access assignments online, as well as complete online journal assignments. Dependent learners are given detailed instructional handouts and they are thoroughly covered in class. Competitive, and collaborative learners are encouraged by class discussion. Participant learners are free to ask questions in class, or visit him during office hours. And avoidant learners have the opportunity to take Dr. Holladays online course.
Knowing how a student learns is not only essential for the student, but for the college, professors, and tutors as well. Testing students on their learning style is imperative for matching the students learning styles with the professors teaching styles. The college, professors, students, and tutors have the advantage when students learning styles are documented. A students grades may increase, enrollment increases, and testing students for his or her learning style is not expensive. Identifying a professors teaching style is inexpensive, and is not time consuming. Although all learning styles should be taught to students, a college, professors, tutors, and students could achieve their highest goals if they all knew about and accommodated learning styles.
Works Cited
Diaz, David P. and Ryan B. Cartnal. Students Learning Styles in Two Classes: Online Distance Learning and Equivalent
On-Campus. Education. 47.4 (Fall1999): 1-9. Wilson Select Plus. OCLC First Search. Monroe County Community College Library. Monroe, MI. 30 Oct. 2003.
Felder, Richard. Matters of Style. Education. 6 (Dec. 1996): 1-11. Wilson Select Plus. OCLC First Search. Monroe County Community College Library. Monroe, MI. 30 Oct. 2003.
Johnston, Christine A. Using the Learning Combination Inventory. Education. 55 (Dec. 1997 and Jan. 1998): 1-7.
Wilson Select Plus. OCLC First Search. Monroe County Community College Library. Monroe, MI. 30 Oct. 2003.
|